<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doctrine Archives - Scaturrex</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scaturrex.eu/category/non-classe-en/doct_en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scaturrex.eu/category/non-classe-en/doct_en/</link>
	<description>Sainte, Catholique, Apostolique, Traditionnelle, Une, Romaine, Reine, Eglise, Xti du Christ † Tradition † Sede Vacante</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration is invalid</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration: Return to Patristic Sources or Rupture with the Roman Tradition? A Theological and Liturgical Analysis of the Claimed Derivation from St. Hippolytus’ Apostolic Tradition Table of Contents   Introduction: The Context of the Controversy   The Claimed “Direct Derivation” from the Apostolic Tradition of <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/">The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration is invalid</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Heresy gets Papal Office lost&#8221; (D.T.C.)</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Loss of the Papacy or Deposition of the Pope for Heresy (according to the D.T.C. and others) Table of Contents   Chapter I — Preliminary Notes and Fundamental Principle   Chapter II — The Doctrine in the Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique (D.T.C.): Controversy on the Exemption from Heresy and Deposition <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/">&#8220;Heresy gets Papal Office lost&#8221; (D.T.C.)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baptism in Vatican II: Doubtful or Invalid!</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 23:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was asked the question about the validity of baptism conferred by heretics and schismatics, like the conciliar ones of Vatican II. First, let&#8217;s look at baptism by all heretics and schismatics, then we will consider the situation in the conciliar sect of Vatican II. I. Baptism Conferred by a <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/">Baptism in Vatican II: Doubtful or Invalid!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right of Conclave by College of Bishops</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Right of Conclave by the College of Bishops In an Imperfect General Council (I.G.C.) &#160; Table of Contents  Introduction  I. Doctrinal Foundations of Hierarchical Continuity and Papal Election   a) Powers of the College of Bishops in the Absence of Papal Authority   b) Infallibility of the Unanimous College   <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/">Right of Conclave by College of Bishops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valid and Licit Missals</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Liturgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Valid and Licit Missals in these times of prolonged sedevacantism Who decides to use which missal and with which jurisdiction? &#160; Table of Contents: Concern for Unity Unity Remains However&#8230; the reforms The Liturgical Reforms under Pius XII and the Imposed Missals The Imposition of the Missal of 1962 <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/">Valid and Licit Missals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supplied Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Jurisdiction of Suppliance during a Period of Prolonged Vacancy of the Apostolic See &#160; Table of contents:   Introduction &#8211; Definition and importance of the jurisdiction of suppliance. &#8211; Context of the prolonged vacancy and promise of Christ. Doctrinal Foundations &#8211; The Church as a perfect and indefectible society. <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/">Supplied Jurisdiction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indefectibility of the Church</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Doctrine of the Indefectibility of the Catholic Church &#160; Table of Contents   Introduction Definition of Indefectibility Scriptural and Traditional Foundations 3.1 Scriptural Foundations 3.2 Traditional Foundations Aspects of Indefectibility Continuity of Ecclesiastical Authority in Times of Crisis 5.1 Principle of Devolution, Supplied Jurisdiction and Role of Faithful Bishops 5.2 <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/">Indefectibility of the Church</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bull &#8220;Cum ex Apostolatus Officio&#8221; and the Universal &#038; Peaceful Acceptance of a Pope</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-vi-bull/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-vi-bull/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul IV&#8217;s Bull &#8220;Cum ex Apostolatus Officio&#8221;  and the Universal &#38; Peaceful Acceptance of a Pope Reconciliation with the Dogmatic Fact and the Infallibility of the Church Table of Contents I. Introduction  II. The Doctrine of the Universal and Peaceful Acceptance of a Pope   III. Paul IV&#8217;s Bull Cum ex <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-vi-bull/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-vi-bull/">Bull &#8220;Cum ex Apostolatus Officio&#8221; and the Universal &#038; Peaceful Acceptance of a Pope</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-vi-bull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vatican II is Apostate “Nostra Aetate”</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/vatican-ii-is-apostate/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/vatican-ii-is-apostate/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 22:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaticanum II]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Vatican II is apostate “Nostra Aetate” and the “Spirit of Assisi” &#160; Documentary of the facts of the antipope John Paul II&#8217;s apostasy &#160; Table of contents   Introduction &#8211; Presentation of the apostasy of Nostra Aetate and its application through the “spirit of Assisi”. Theological Definition of Apostasy &#8211; Definition <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/vatican-ii-is-apostate/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/vatican-ii-is-apostate/">Vatican II is Apostate “Nostra Aetate”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/vatican-ii-is-apostate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heresy of Vatican II: “Dignitatis Humanae”</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/heresy-of-vatican-ii-dignitatis-humanae/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/heresy-of-vatican-ii-dignitatis-humanae/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 22:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaticanum II]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Major Heresy of Vatican II: “Dignitatis Humanae” in contradiction with the dogma of the Royalty of Christ   Table of contents   &#8211; Introduction &#8211; Proofs drawn from “Ils L’ont Découronné” that “Dignitatis Humanae” is in contradiction with Tradition &#8211; 1. Religious liberty as a universal right &#8211; 2. Neutrality <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/heresy-of-vatican-ii-dignitatis-humanae/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/heresy-of-vatican-ii-dignitatis-humanae/">Heresy of Vatican II: “Dignitatis Humanae”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/24/heresy-of-vatican-ii-dignitatis-humanae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tacit Resignation By Public Defection from the Faith</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/23/tacit-resignation-by-public-defection-from-the-faith/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/23/tacit-resignation-by-public-defection-from-the-faith/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tacit Resignation of an Ecclesiastical Office By Public Defection from the Faith According to Canon 188 of the 1917 Code Table of Contents   Introduction 1. General Concepts of Tacit Resignation According to Canon 188 Argument 1: Tacit resignation is not a presumption, but a true resignation, equivalent to an <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/23/tacit-resignation-by-public-defection-from-the-faith/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/23/tacit-resignation-by-public-defection-from-the-faith/">Tacit Resignation By Public Defection from the Faith</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/23/tacit-resignation-by-public-defection-from-the-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schism and Schismatic</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/22/schism-and-schismatic/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/22/schism-and-schismatic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Schism and Schismatic &#160; Table of Contents:   Introduction Definition of Schism Conditions: a)Valid Baptism b) Material Object c) Pertinacity It is divided into two categories: Formal Schism Material Schism &#8211; Difference between Schism and Heresy &#8211; Refutation of Modernist Counter-Arguments Definition of the Schismatic &#8211; A- Formal Schismatic &#8211; <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/22/schism-and-schismatic/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/22/schism-and-schismatic/">Schism and Schismatic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/22/schism-and-schismatic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
