<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scaturrex</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scaturrex.eu/en/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scaturrex.eu/en/</link>
	<description>Sainte, Catholique, Apostolique, Traditionnelle, Une, Romaine, Reine, Eglise, Xti du Christ † Tradition † Sede Vacante</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration is invalid</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration: Return to Patristic Sources or Rupture with the Roman Tradition? A Theological and Liturgical Analysis of the Claimed Derivation from St. Hippolytus’ Apostolic Tradition Table of Contents   Introduction: The Context of the Controversy   The Claimed “Direct Derivation” from the Apostolic Tradition of <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/">The 1968 Rite of Episcopal Consecration is invalid</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/13/the-1968-rite-of-episcopal-consecration-is-invalid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Heresy gets Papal Office lost&#8221; (D.T.C.)</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Loss of the Papacy or Deposition of the Pope for Heresy (according to the D.T.C. and others) Table of Contents   Chapter I — Preliminary Notes and Fundamental Principle   Chapter II — The Doctrine in the Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique (D.T.C.): Controversy on the Exemption from Heresy and Deposition <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/">&#8220;Heresy gets Papal Office lost&#8221; (D.T.C.)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/04/11/heresy-gets-papal-office-lost-according-to-d-t-c-e-o/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Siri Thesis: For and Against</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/30/the-siri-thesis-for-and-against/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/30/the-siri-thesis-for-and-against/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad solutions for the crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An Objective Historical, Canonical, and Theological Presentation of the Arguments Concerning the Alleged Election of Cardinal Giuseppe Siri as Pope Gregory XVII in the Conclaves of 1958 and 1963   Table of Contents   Introduction   Chapter 1 – Arguments in Favor of the Siri Thesis   Chapter 2 – <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/30/the-siri-thesis-for-and-against/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/30/the-siri-thesis-for-and-against/">The Siri Thesis: For and Against</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/30/the-siri-thesis-for-and-against/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baptism in Vatican II: Doubtful or Invalid!</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 23:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was asked the question about the validity of baptism conferred by heretics and schismatics, like the conciliar ones of Vatican II. First, let&#8217;s look at baptism by all heretics and schismatics, then we will consider the situation in the conciliar sect of Vatican II. I. Baptism Conferred by a <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/">Baptism in Vatican II: Doubtful or Invalid!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/03/06/baptism-in-vatican-ii-doubtful-or-invalid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right of Conclave by College of Bishops</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bishops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Right of Conclave by the College of Bishops In an Imperfect General Council (I.G.C.) &#160; Table of Contents  Introduction  I. Doctrinal Foundations of Hierarchical Continuity and Papal Election   a) Powers of the College of Bishops in the Absence of Papal Authority   b) Infallibility of the Unanimous College   <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/">Right of Conclave by College of Bishops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/right-of-conclave-by-college-of-bishops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>General Conclusion</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/conclusion/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/conclusion/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>General Conclusion &#160; “The Catholic Church resembles a spring: the more one pushes it down, the more it springs back with vigour” (P.L.) The Catholic Church, founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ as a visible and perfect society, necessarily subsists until the end of time, indefectible in its hierarchical constitution <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/conclusion/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/conclusion/">General Conclusion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lay Simony on Indolent Clergy</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/lay-simony-on-indolent-clergy/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/lay-simony-on-indolent-clergy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral theology and discipline of the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lay Simony on Indolent Clergy Problem of laymen exerting undue influence by their financial contributions, governing in fact certain indolent priests, in contempt of episcopal authority. &#160; Table of Contents &#160; Introduction The State of the question Definition of the problem according to traditional Catholic doctrine Millenary historical roots Current <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/lay-simony-on-indolent-clergy/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/lay-simony-on-indolent-clergy/">Lay Simony on Indolent Clergy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/lay-simony-on-indolent-clergy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hierarchical Submission actually</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/hierarchical-submission-actually/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/hierarchical-submission-actually/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Not rated]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hierarchical Submission Moral Necessity of Hierarchical Submission in the Catholic Church in Times of Prolonged Vacancy of the Apostolic See Table of Contents:  I. Introduction II. Doctrinal Foundations of Hierarchical Submission III. Moral Duty of the Faithful: Submission to a True Catholic Priest IV. Moral Duty of Priests: Submission to <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/hierarchical-submission-actually/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/hierarchical-submission-actually/">Hierarchical Submission actually</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/hierarchical-submission-actually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valid and Licit Missals</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Liturgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacraments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solution to the crisis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Valid and Licit Missals in these times of prolonged sedevacantism Who decides to use which missal and with which jurisdiction? &#160; Table of Contents: Concern for Unity Unity Remains However&#8230; the reforms The Liturgical Reforms under Pius XII and the Imposed Missals The Imposition of the Missal of 1962 <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/">Valid and Licit Missals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/31/licit-missels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supplied Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postconciliar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Jurisdiction of Suppliance during a Period of Prolonged Vacancy of the Apostolic See &#160; Table of contents:   Introduction &#8211; Definition and importance of the jurisdiction of suppliance. &#8211; Context of the prolonged vacancy and promise of Christ. Doctrinal Foundations &#8211; The Church as a perfect and indefectible society. <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/">Supplied Jurisdiction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/30/the-jurisdiction-of-suppliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indefectibility of the Church</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctrine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Doctrine of the Indefectibility of the Catholic Church &#160; Table of Contents   Introduction Definition of Indefectibility Scriptural and Traditional Foundations 3.1 Scriptural Foundations 3.2 Traditional Foundations Aspects of Indefectibility Continuity of Ecclesiastical Authority in Times of Crisis 5.1 Principle of Devolution, Supplied Jurisdiction and Role of Faithful Bishops 5.2 <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/">Indefectibility of the Church</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/indefectibility-of-the-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul VI Pope Became Antipope</title>
		<link>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-6-antipope/</link>
					<comments>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-6-antipope/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Laurent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case of an heretical pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis in the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scaturrex.eu/?p=7728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Case of Paul VI Pope Becoming Antipope Become Formal Heretic Has Lost His Office &#160; Table of Contents:   Introduction Section 1: Definitions and Fundamental Distinctions 1.1. Definition of Heresy and Its Consequences 1.2. Distinction Heresy Material/Formal 1.3. Pertinacity 1.4. Resistance Section 2: The Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio <a class="more-link" href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-6-antipope/">Continuer à lire →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-6-antipope/">Paul VI Pope Became Antipope</a> appeared first on <a href="https://scaturrex.eu/en">Scaturrex</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://scaturrex.eu/2026/01/28/paul-6-antipope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
