Summary deviation of false “Resistance”

Bishop Williamson:

The most controversial figure post 2012 in which many follow whether informed or uninformed. To his credit:

• He stood up, for what we publicly know, against the new direction of the neo-SSPX within his Eleison Comments of 2012.

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• Accepts the false “Extraordinary mass” in the 2007 Moto Proprio:
• Accepts the false “lifting of the excommunications”. With his own pen, he gives a sincere personal thank you to Benedict XVI:
• At his expulsion from the SSPX, he wrote an open letter to Bishop Fellay stating he is still a SSPX priest and one of its Bishops http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/two-bishops-in-one- williamson.4814/
• He states however he is NOT of the “Resistance”; he does NOT want to lead NOR organize. He believes it is not going anywhere. “Put away your toys” he declared for anyone wanting to see it transpire. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuYMrqp34ig
• He states that each priest should be independent and have no organization. Eleison Comments Nov. 3, 2012 https://stmarcelinitiative.com/andnow/
• He believes in the conciliar church. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson- believes-in-the-conciliar-church.3918/ And here, http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop- williamson-believes-in-the-conciliar-church.3918/
• He legitimizes the novus ordo mass saying people can actively go to it. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php? threads/bishop-williamson-states-novus-ordo-mass-is-legitimate.2892/
• He believes and promotes a book on the Church’s INDEX called Maria Valtorta and her Poem of the Man-God. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-believes-valtorta-a-gift-from- god.4027/ The Avrille Dominicans rebuked this http://www.dominicansavrille.us/wha…-the-poem-of- the-man-god-by-maria-valtorta-2/
• He administered Confirmations to the Feeneyite Chapel; twice! http://cor-mariae.com/index.php? thr…mations-at-feeneyite-chapel-may-25-2016.3987/ He did say in Nov. 2012, quote: “For myself, as soon as my situation stabilizes in England, I am ready to put my bishop’s powers at the disposal of whoever can make wise use of them.” Eleison Comments https://stmarcelinitiative.com/andnow/
• He believes in novus ordo “miracles”. (Conference in Mahopac NY (usa), June 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015; Eleison Comments #437, 30th November 2015)
• When asked to retract these errors, Bishop Williamson banged his fist on the table with an emphatic

“No! I would not consider it!”. Conference in Veneta, Oregon (USA) – 19th September, 2016 http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/bishop-williamson-“keeps-digging”.4595/

He says that the Anglican church has true worship in it
More unbelievable quotes from Bishop Williamson can be found here, http://cor-mariae.com/index.php? thr…rting-the-new-religion-and-conciliarism.4457/ ___________________________________________________________________________

Bishop Faure:

• He accepts and supports Bp. Williamson’s belief in the NOM. “Where did you see that Archbishop Lefebvre said that the New Mass is outside the Church?” (Bishop Faure, Letter to Father Ernesto Cardozo, 1/6/2016)
• He accepts and supports Bp. Williamson’s belief in the novus ordo “miracles”. http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/letter-from-fr-altamira-to-bishop-faure.3606/ And confirmed in Bishop Aquinas’ own letter to defend Bishop Williamson’s errors. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php? threads/dom-thomas-defends-b-williamson-miracles-in-no-masses.3068/
• Believes in the conciliar church.
• It was discovered however he founded the new congregation for “political purposes”. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr…-new-congregation-for-political-reasons.5066/
• Refuses to accept other priests who disagree with his errors. “Do not invite Father Cardozo to say Mass.” (Bishop Faure, Letter to the faithful of Santo Andres)
• Bishop Thomas Aquinas:

To his credit:

• He stood up side by side with Archbishop Lefebvre in the early days; Was removed by his mother Monastery in Le Barroux France; Chastised by Menzingen being against their own modernism with Rome causing a split within the three Traditional monasteries; Detracted from the other traditional Benedictines supported and developed by him -in France and America.
• His public position (post 2012 to date):

• He defends and accepts Bp. Williamson’s position on the NOM.
• He defends and accepts Bp. Williamson’s position on the novus ordo “miracles”. http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/dom-thomas-defends-b-williamson-miracles-in-no-masses.3068/
• Believes in the conciliar church. “It cannot be said, absolutely, that the conciliar church is not the Catholic Church.” (Bishop Aquinas, “In defense of Bp. Williamson 1”). http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/dom-thomas-defends-b-williamson-miracles-in-no-masses.3068/
• Boycotts anyone who goes against Bishop Williamson. ________________________________________________________________________
• Avrille Dominicans:

• The Dominicans are helping to teach in Bishop Faure new seminary. Their public position (post 2012 to date):

• The Dominicans stated they are not “taking sides” between those who are opposed to the liberal conciliar SSPX to those within the SSPX position itself. Avrillé Dominicans July Declaration (analysis) page 22.
• They now believe in the conciliar church.
• They too support Sedevacantism in the false resistance:
• They support the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and are silent on their errors!

  ________________________________________________________________________

  Fr. Gerardo Zendejas:

To his credit:

• He was strong and prosperous within the SSPX; though silent regarding the deal with the SSPX/Rome relations.

His public position (post 2014 to date):

• To this day, Fr. Zendejas had never stated his public position why he left the SSPX. He lets people believe it is because of the SSPX/Rome relations; but never confirmed nor denied it when directly asked. Being so, there was a real concern from priests and faithful where he was coming from and what his motives were. Archbishop Lefebvre said the faithful have a strict right to know the doctrine of their priests. Fr. Zendejas remained silent; but aggressive in taking over some of the established chapels within the Catholic Resistance. See here directly from the priests themselves: http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/father-zendejas-joins-the-catholic-resistance.2720/
• Believes: “The apparent conflict between ‘obedience’ and ‘Truth’ rests on AMBIGUITY” [??? Not true. Truth and obedience are not alternatives, they go together. ]; There might be salvation outside the conciliar church; The novelty and false teaching of Vatican II came AFTER. See here, http://www.therecusant.com/fake-resistance-statements
• Also, Who is Fr. Gerardo Zendejas? See TheRecusant, Issue 31 – November/December 2015 (page 38) http://www.stmarysksSSPXmc.com/?page_id=46He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors! ________________________________________________________________________Fr. Chazal:

To his credit:

• He was strong and prosperous within the SSPX and was one of the first with Fr. Pfeiffer to go public with the SSPX modernism/Rome relations.
• He was expelled from the SSPX in Oct. 2012.
• He began SSPX-MC missions throughout the world with Fr. Pfeiffer.

His public position (post 2012 to date):

• Fr. Chazal believes in N.O. “miracles”. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/fr-chazal-believes-in-n-o-miracles.4399/
• Supports Bp. Williamson and the other two false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility regardless of their open errors. Fr. Chazal now dismisses the errors as just thing we need to deal with “I’d rather stick to the dino”. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr…er-to-the-australian-faithful.3758/#post-6295
• Broke away from the SSPX-MC and announces he is starting his [third?] group. http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?thr…-with-archbishop-lefebvre-begins-hybrid.4265/ Yet contradicts himself and says that “centralization and concentration of power” is a bad thing (?). http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/more-foolery-and-slander-from-the-false-resistance.5008/

Credit :

He stood up as a Prior of the SSPX with admonishment before Bishop Fellay fostering the corruption of modernism within the neo-SSPX and sell-out to conciliar Rome.

Deviation :

• He began helping Fr. Chazal in the seminary and missions in Asia. His public position (post 2014 to date):

• He supports and aligns with the three false resistance bishops out of utility; and down plays Bp. Williamson’s errors in a conference he gave in Australia. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/fr- picots-conference.3687/

__________________________________________________________________________Father Trincado:

To his credit: He stood up before Bishop Fellay against the modernism in the neo-SSPX.

• Is the [author] of the Non Possumus website and sister site Syllabus-errorum.blogspotHis public position (post 2013 to date):

Deviation :

• Believes and supports Bp. Williamson’s view of the NOM, and it’s novus ordo “miracles”.
• He dedicates his two websites to Bp. Williamson’s cause; again out of utility regardless of the errors.

___________________________________________________________________________

• Fr. Juan Carlos Ortiz:

To his credit:

• He too stood up against Menzingen for their false deal with Rome.
• He wrote a fantastic article entitled “THE NEW “HERMENEUTICS” OF BISHOP FELLAY Has the Society changed its position?” http://www.therecusant.com/fr-ortiz-speaks-out His public position (post 2013 to date):

BUT

• He aligns and supports out of utility the three false ‘resistance’ bishops; while remaining silent to their errors, he has come out to attack anyone who is against them. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php? thr…-ortiz-against-olmc-the-fathers-respond.4757/

To his credit:

• He made a declaration against the SSPX/Rome deal. http://www.therecusant.com/frgirouard-declaration
• Started a chapel in western Canada.His public position (post 2013 to date):

BUT :

• Refuses to expand in helping missions without personal compensation. http://cor- mariae.com/index.php?threads/false-resistance-contracts.4931/
• He supports the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility and chastises those who don’t. He is silent on their errors!

_______________________________________________________________________

Fr. Richard Voigt:

To his credit:

• Was a part of the original stand against Menzingen openly starting an opposition.

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• Became resolute to follow the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; and is silent on their errors!
• Started his own home mission in Utica, New York.
• _______________________________________________________________________Fr. Ringrose:[Unknown post false resistance]

• ________________________________________________________________________Fr. MacDonald:To his credit:

• Also stood against Menzingen openly starting an opposition.

His public position (post 2013 to date):

• With a dialectic, he says he doesn’t agree with what Bp. Williamson said regarding the NOM (above), he yet says that “In this case His Excellency gave bad advice. Most good priests do from time to time. The Church is infallible, priests and bishops are not.” (Fr. MacDonald letter to Mr. Johnson’s false claim defending Bp. Williamson) http://www.cor-mariae.com/index.php…ieves-in-the-conciliar-church.3918/#post-6703 The dialectic is that Fr. MacDonald remains the error(s) only as a view (conveniently?) of “bad advice” when Bp. Williamson adamantly shows over and over again, Fr. MacDonald knows, a pertinacity in his Eleison Comments and conferences spreading this SAME error!

_

• Fr. MacDonald now supports and aligns himself in utility to the work of the three false ‘resistance’ bishops NOW remaining silent to their errors. So much so, that he now “defends” them by chastising others who do not support these errant bishops! http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?threads/the- underground-false-resistance.4930/
• Fr. MacDonald began to disclose his own precarious understanding of “grace” and the new mass here still under development. http://cor-mariae.com/index.php?thr…bishop-williamsons-strange-new- theology.4933/

  _______________________________________________

  Priests of the USML: (Fr. Olivier Rioult, Fr. Pierre Roy, Fr. Nicolas Pinaud [who are open sedevacantists], and Fr. Pivert, Fr. Bruno, Fr. Zendejas)

  To their credit:

• They stood up respectively against the workings of Menzingen trying to acquire a practical deal with modern Rome.

Their public position (post 2013 to date):
• They all support and align with the three false ‘resistance’ bishops out of utility; while silent to their errors!

link